<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Frustrations with Silverlight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.akawebdesign.com/2008/11/05/frustrations-with-silverlight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.akawebdesign.com/2008/11/05/frustrations-with-silverlight/</link>
	<description>Longtime nerd. Rockstar developer.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 11:52:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art</title>
		<link>http://www.akawebdesign.com/2008/11/05/frustrations-with-silverlight/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Art</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.akawebdesign.com/index.php/2008/11/05/frustrations-with-silverlight/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>(jeff&#039;s response via email)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Not sure if you saw Scott Guthrie&#039;s blog this morning, but if you can manage to work in Visual Studio for a while, it looks like they are working to integrate design functionality there for Silverlight 3.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2008/11/16/update-on-silverlight-2-and-a-glimpse-of-silverlight-3.aspx&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;They definitely seem to be doing this right - just not everything at once. =)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(jeff&#8217;s response via email)</p>
<p>Not sure if you saw Scott Guthrie&#8217;s blog this morning, but if you can manage to work in Visual Studio for a while, it looks like they are working to integrate design functionality there for Silverlight 3.</p>
<p><a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2008/11/16/update-on-silverlight-2-and-a-glimpse-of-silverlight-3.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2008/11/16/update-on-silverlight-2-and-a-glimpse-of-silverlight-3.aspx</a></p>
<p>They definitely seem to be doing this right &#8211; just not everything at once. =)</p>
<p>Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art</title>
		<link>http://www.akawebdesign.com/2008/11/05/frustrations-with-silverlight/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Art</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 22:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.akawebdesign.com/index.php/2008/11/05/frustrations-with-silverlight/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>(my response to Jeff, via email)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I think part of my frustration with Silverlight also stems from the fact that I have to buy Expression Blend (which is expensive!). I really like Visual Web Developer Express, which I use for a bunch of ASP.NET and C# apps, but there doesn&#039;t seem to be an option for using Expression Blend without shelling out $500. I use Visual Studio 2008 at my office, and I can guarantee they won&#039;t be spending more money unless I can really prove it&#039;s worth the cost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(my response to Jeff, via email)</p>
<p>I think part of my frustration with Silverlight also stems from the fact that I have to buy Expression Blend (which is expensive!). I really like Visual Web Developer Express, which I use for a bunch of ASP.NET and C# apps, but there doesn&#8217;t seem to be an option for using Expression Blend without shelling out $500. I use Visual Studio 2008 at my office, and I can guarantee they won&#8217;t be spending more money unless I can really prove it&#8217;s worth the cost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art</title>
		<link>http://www.akawebdesign.com/2008/11/05/frustrations-with-silverlight/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Art</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 22:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.akawebdesign.com/index.php/2008/11/05/frustrations-with-silverlight/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>(received via email)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I saw your blog post regarding getting into Silverlight. Let me know if there&#039;s anything I can do to help out - I know it can be frustrating to get rolling, but it&#039;s pretty nice when you do.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Regarding the development platforms, Blend and Visual Studio should not be looked at as separate environments so much as complementary tool sets. Yes, you can make apps in both, but I couldn&#039;t see working with only one or the other. Blend&#039;s strength is the graphical portion of layout, storyboard creation, object development, etc., while Visual Studio is (obviously) where the work gets done.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I did use both tools in my book, but spent the majority of time in code. Still, I find Blend to be fairly intuitive and good at what it does.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Feel free to drop me a line if you have any questions.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Jeff Paries</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(received via email)</p>
<p>I saw your blog post regarding getting into Silverlight. Let me know if there&#8217;s anything I can do to help out &#8211; I know it can be frustrating to get rolling, but it&#8217;s pretty nice when you do.</p>
<p>Regarding the development platforms, Blend and Visual Studio should not be looked at as separate environments so much as complementary tool sets. Yes, you can make apps in both, but I couldn&#8217;t see working with only one or the other. Blend&#8217;s strength is the graphical portion of layout, storyboard creation, object development, etc., while Visual Studio is (obviously) where the work gets done.</p>
<p>I did use both tools in my book, but spent the majority of time in code. Still, I find Blend to be fairly intuitive and good at what it does.</p>
<p>Feel free to drop me a line if you have any questions.</p>
<p>Jeff Paries</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

